SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 1995

MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, SANJIV KHANNA
SURENDRA M. MITTAL – Appellant
Versus
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ADITYA NARAIN

SANJIV KHANNA, J.

( 1 ) THE present Letters Patent Appeal is directed against order dated 2nd december, 2005 passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing the writ petition of the appellant. In the said writ petition, the appellant no. 1 had challenged orders dated 9th May, 2002, 29th September, 2003 and 16th August, 2004 passed by the National Commission constituted under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as the Act, for short ).

( 2 ) THE appellant, who appeared in person, argued that on 9th May, 2002, the National Commission had while reserving its order in First Appeal No. 49/1995 titled Ravinder Kumar versus Surender Kumar Mittal granted time to the parties to file their written synopsis and these were subsequently filed but the national Commission proceeded to dispose of the appeal itself on 9th May, 2002 by dictating an order in chamber. It was also stated by the appellant that no arguments were heard and addressed by parties on 9th May, 2002. Thus there has been violation of principles of natural justice. The subsequent orders also made subject matter of the writ petition, being orders dated 29th September, 2003 and 16th August, 2004, are passed b










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top