SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 2198

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
SANTOKH SINGH – Appellant
Versus
SURJEET KAUR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ALOK AGARWAL, Arvind Pandey, Dhananjay Pandey, Kunal Sinha, R.S.Chhabra, SANJAY CHHABRA

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.

( 1 ) THE plaintiff, defendant no. 4 and late Shri Anup Singh are brothers and sons of late Shri Hazara Singh. Defendants no. 1 to 3 are the legal heirs of late shri Anup Singh. The plaintiff has filed a suit for partition in respect of residential house situated at D-81, Naraina Residential Scheme, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the suit property ).

( 2 ) IT is the case of the plaintiff that the suit property was purchased by the plaintiff, late Shri Anup Singh, and his two brothers who became joint owners in equal share in the suit property in pursuance to a perpetual lease deed dated 5. 3. 1970, executed by the Land and Housing Department. A house was constructed in 1973 on the aforesaid land but since all the brothers were married and there were discord and disagreement amongst the women member of the family, the plaintiff decided to shift to another accommodation at C-128, Naraina Industrial area, New Delhi, a property jointly owned by the brothers.

( 3 ) THE plaintiff states that he along with his two brothers were also running the business under the name and style of M/s Prakash Radio from C-128, Phase-1, industrial Area, Naraina Vihar, New D




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top