SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 2238

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
RAM DASS – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Jaideep Malik, S.L.KASHYAP

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.

( 1 ) PETITIONERS are the father-in-law, mother-in-law, husband, younger brother of the husband and the younger married sister of the husband of the complainant. They seek pre-arrest bail in the afore-noted FIR.

( 2 ) ON 23. 7. 2007 parties were referred for mediation. Unfortunately, mediation has failed due to the non-cooperative attitude of the petitioners. Page 1 of 3

( 3 ) THE complainant has been thrown out of her matrimonial house with 2 children. All petitioners are present in Court. I have specifically asked petitioner No. 3, the husband of the complainant and petitioner No. 1, the father-in-law of the complainant whether they are prepared to give some monthly maintenance to the complainant. They have refused.

( 4 ) THE investigating officer informs that the petitioners own a residential house in Delhi, though in an unauthorized colony. The house has 5 rooms on the ground floor and 4 rooms on the first floor. Out of 9 rooms, 5 have been let out to tenants.

( 5 ) PETITIONER No. 1 and 3 admit that the 5 rooms have been let out to the tenants but state that the house in question is the joint property of the first petitioner and his brother.

( 6 ) NO









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top