PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
RAM DASS – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
( 1 ) PETITIONERS are the father-in-law, mother-in-law, husband, younger brother of the husband and the younger married sister of the husband of the complainant. They seek pre-arrest bail in the afore-noted FIR.
( 2 ) ON 23. 7. 2007 parties were referred for mediation. Unfortunately, mediation has failed due to the non-cooperative attitude of the petitioners. Page 1 of 3
( 3 ) THE complainant has been thrown out of her matrimonial house with 2 children. All petitioners are present in Court. I have specifically asked petitioner No. 3, the husband of the complainant and petitioner No. 1, the father-in-law of the complainant whether they are prepared to give some monthly maintenance to the complainant. They have refused.
( 4 ) THE investigating officer informs that the petitioners own a residential house in Delhi, though in an unauthorized colony. The house has 5 rooms on the ground floor and 4 rooms on the first floor. Out of 9 rooms, 5 have been let out to tenants.
( 5 ) PETITIONER No. 1 and 3 admit that the 5 rooms have been let out to the tenants but state that the house in question is the joint property of the first petitioner and his brother.
( 6 ) NO
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.