SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 2465

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
HARMEET SINGH PAINTAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) – Respondent


PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.

( 1 ) ALL petitions can be disposed by a common order for the reason learned counsel for the parties agree that save and except the cheque number, date of cheque and the amount, each and every averment in the complaints which are sought to be quashed in the instant petitions are identical.

( 2 ) SINCE matter was argued with reference to Crl. M. C. No. 2953/05, complaint forming subject matter of the said petition may be noted.

( 3 ) BUT before that it may be recorded that all the complaints are under Section 138 read with Section 141 of N. I. Act. The complainant is National small Industries Corporation Ltd. Accused No. 1 is M/s Jay Rapid Rollers Ltd. It is a company registered under the Companies Act. Accused No. 2, Sukhbir Singh is stated to be the Managing Director of accused No. 1. Accused No. 3 is the petitioner, stated to be the Director of accused No. 1.

( 4 ) THE complaint is short and cryptic. It may be reproduced verbatim.

"1. That the complainant firm is a Govt. of India Enterprises having its office at NSIC Bhawan, Okhla Industrial Estate, New Delhi and Sh. Satender kumar, Development Officer (Law) has been authorized to file the complaint vid
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top