2007 Supreme(Del) 2464
SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
MADHU SANKHLA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS application has been made by the appellant for suspension of sentence. The appellant has been convicted by the Trial Court under Section 7 and 13 (2) read with Section 13 (1) (d) of Prevention and Corruption Act, 1988. The appellant was working in Delhi Police as Sub Inspector and posted in CAW cell Amar Colony. She was investigating FIR No. 997/98 PS Sriniwaspuri lodged by PW 2 Mr. Ratan Kumar Modi. The complainant found that investigation of the case was not being done and charge-sheet was not being filed in the case and when he contacted the Investigating Officer i. e. the appellant, a demand of rs. 50,000/- as bribe was made from him. A report was made by him to CBI in respect of this demand of bribe and a trap was laid. In his complaint he reported demand having been made by ACP Smt. Praveen Dutt, Inspector Shashi punj and the appellant and out of total demand of Rs. 50,000/- the appellant had to pay first installment of payment to the police officials on 1. 10. 1999. He took Rs. 5,000/- each for the appellant and Ms. Shashi Punj, Inspector, and Rs. 10,000/- for Ms. Parveen Dutt, ACP. However, the evidence shows that entire amount of Rs. 20,000/- bribe was received/
Click Here to Read the rest of this document