SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 2464

SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
MADHU SANKHLA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


( 1 ) THIS application has been made by the appellant for suspension of sentence. The appellant has been convicted by the Trial Court under Section 7 and 13 (2) read with Section 13 (1) (d) of Prevention and Corruption Act, 1988. The appellant was working in Delhi Police as Sub Inspector and posted in CAW cell Amar Colony. She was investigating FIR No. 997/98 PS Sriniwaspuri lodged by PW 2 Mr. Ratan Kumar Modi. The complainant found that investigation of the case was not being done and charge-sheet was not being filed in the case and when he contacted the Investigating Officer i. e. the appellant, a demand of rs. 50,000/- as bribe was made from him. A report was made by him to CBI in respect of this demand of bribe and a trap was laid. In his complaint he reported demand having been made by ACP Smt. Praveen Dutt, Inspector Shashi punj and the appellant and out of total demand of Rs. 50,000/- the appellant had to pay first installment of payment to the police officials on 1. 10. 1999. He took Rs. 5,000/- each for the appellant and Ms. Shashi Punj, Inspector, and Rs. 10,000/- for Ms. Parveen Dutt, ACP. However, the evidence shows that entire amount of Rs. 20,000/- bribe was received/








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top