SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Del) 1823

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
Mohd. Saleem – Appellant
Versus
Naseer Ahmed – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S. K. Bhaduri, for Petitioner; R. K. Saini, for Respondent.

ORDER :- CM Nos. 11177/2006 and 11178/2006 These applications have been filed to bring on record the legal heirs of the deceased respondent who passed away on 10-9-2005. The legal heirs are set out in para 2 of the application. Since the factum of the demise of the respondent was not known earlier and only came to be known in the proceedings in Court the application has been filed for condonation of delay. The legal heirs have been served but none has put an appearance.

For the reasons stated in the application, the delay in filing the application is condoned and the legal heirs as set out in the application are brought on record.

Applications are allowed.

Amended Memo of parties is taken on record.

CM (M) No. 580/2003

1. The petitioners filed a suit for declaration, mandatory injunction and damages against the respondent alleging that the respondent is the step-brother of the petitioners. The suit property is stated to have been purchased by the petitioners in the year 1992. The original respondent herein was stated to be residing gratis in the suit property but failed to vacate the same on being asked to do so. Issues were framed in the suit but before evidence cou ld be led, the peti



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top