SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Del) 996

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
Deepashree – Appellant
Versus
Sultan Chand – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appearing Parties:Nandini Gidwaney, Rakesh Sachdeva, Advocates.

JUDGMENT :

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.

(1) APPLICATION is filed u/s. 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, for appointment of Arbitrator. The relationship between the applicant and the respondent is of an author and a publisher. The agreement dated 1. 8. 2008 between the parties contains an arbitration clause as under : "if and when any dispute arises between the parties as to the meaning, interpretation or on implementation of these terms, such dispute shall be referred to the arbitration of two Arbitrators, one to be appointed by the publishers and the other by the author/s. "

(2) DISPUTES and differences have arisen between the parties, the applicant vide legal notice dated 13. 3. 2007 to the respondent nominated Justice a. P. Chaudhary, retired, as the Sole Arbitrator and called upon the respondent to within 30 days consent to his appointment. The respondent sent reply dated 7. 4. 2004 refusing to concur in the appointment of Sole Arbitrator and relying on arbitration clause in the agreement nominated Mr. S. S. Budhiraja, Advocate as the Arbitrator. The applicant thereafter moved the present application.

(3) THE counsel for the applicant has argued that claims of the app










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top