SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Del) 582

KAILASH GAMBHIR
Veena Gandhi – Appellant
Versus
DDA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. R.K. Saini, Adv
Mr. C. Mohan Rao, Adv

KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.

1. The present writ petition is preferred by the petitioner seeking directions for quashing the decision of the respondent in allotting LIG Flat No. 86, First Floor, Group-6, Sector11, Rohini, Delhi to the petitioner at almost double the price of earlier flat being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, unjust and in violation of the Rules, Regulations and policy of equity, justice and good conscience and also to issue writ commanding the respondent to forthwith issue to the petitioner a fresh demand letter in respect of LIG Flat No. 86, First Floor, Group-6, Sector-11, Rohini, Delhi at the same cost at which the earlier flat was allotted to her in 1991 after adjusting the amount already paid by her after adding interest thereupon @ 12% pa for 10 years.

The facts and circumstances of the case, which are relevant for deciding the present petition, are as follows:

In the year 1979, the DDA, respondent herein, under the Delhi Development (Management & Disposal of Housing Estates) regulations, 1968 announced a scheme for allotment of DDA flats to the citizens of the country, namely, the New Pattern Registration Scheme, 1979. The petitioner applied for and was registere
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top