SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Del) 709

MANMOHAN SARIN, MANMOHAN
Autodesk Inc – Appellant
Versus
A. V. T. Shankardass – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr.Saikrishna Rajagopal with Mr.Sidharth Chopra, Advs.
Mr.Dushyant K Mahant, Advocate

Manmohan Sarin, J.

1. This appeal has been preferred by the appellants aggrieved by the order dated 5th March, 2008 passed by the learned Single Judge, dismissing IA No.2852/2008 praying for appointment of a Local Commissioner ex parte.

2. The appellants are the owners of copyright in world famous software 3DS Max and Autodesk Maya. Appellants finding infringement and unauthorized use of their software, filed a suit against the respondents for permanent injunction to restrain infringement of copyright, delivery up, rendition of account of profits and damages etc for unlicensed usage of their software. The suit was accompanied with an application for interim injunction and application for ex parte appointment of Local Commissioner being I.A No. 2852/2008. Summons in the suit were issued and notice in the IA under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC was issued. However, the application for appointment of a Local Commissioner was dismissed by the impugned order against which the present appeal has been filed. While issuing notice in the appeal, we also appointed ex parte Local Commissioner to visit the premises of the respondents to make out an inventory of the unlicensed software belonging to













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top