SANJIV KHANNA
NARAIN SINGH – Appellant
Versus
FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER, DELHI – Respondent
1. Mr. Narain Singh and Mr. Som Dutt (hereinafter referred to as the petitioners, for short) claim that they have purchased 2 bighas 18 biswas and 2 bighas of land, respectively in khasra No. 6/19/2 (min) village Samepur, Delhi vide two separate sale deeds dated 4th May, 1989 executed by one Mr. Maman Singh. The said Mr. Maman Singh is father of Mr. Som Dutt. After purchase of land vide sale deeds dated 4th May, 1989, the petitioners had applied for mutation under the provisions of the Delhi Land Revenue Act, 1954, (hereinafter referred to as the Revenue Act). Mr. Maman Singh was a recorded bhumidar of the land till sale deeds were made. Mutation entries were allowed in favour of the petitioners. By the impugned order dated 10th February, 1995 passed by the Financial Commissioner, the mutation entries have been cancelled.
Impugned Order
2. The Financial Commissioner, has held, that the aforesaid land consisting of 4 bighas and 18 biswas was subject matter of proceedings under Section 81 of the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954(hereinafter referred to as the Reforms Act, for short) and was ordered to be vested in the Gaon Sabha by order passed by SDM/Revenue Assistant
Master Mayank Vashishth v. Financial Commissioner and Ors. 114 (2004) DLT 162
Balbir Singh v. ADM (Revenue) and Ors. (1995) 57 DLT 547
Umed Singh v. Government of NCT of Delhi (1997) 69 DLT 957
Smt. Kasturi Through LRs v. Gaon Sabha (1989) 4 SCC 55
Additional District Magistrate (Revenue) Delhi Administration v. Siri Ram (2000)5 SCC 451
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.