SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Del) 845

SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
Mohd. Saeed Qureshi – Appellant
Versus
Shahabuddin – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. S.P. Sharma, Advocate.
Nemo

JUDGMENT:

1. By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has assailed the order dated 31st May 2008 passed by learned ARC Tribunal dismissing the application of the petitioner under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. 2. An eviction order was passed against the petitioner on 25th May 2007 by the learned ARC under Section 14(1)(b) of Delhi Rent Control Act. Aginst this, the petitioner preferred an appeal under Section 38 of the DRC Act on 21st February 2008 accompanied by an application under Section 5 of the Limitation, since the period of 30 days limitation for filing the appeal had expired. In the application, the petitioner took the plea that he could not file the appeal in time because his wife was seriously ill at that point of time and she expired after long illness. The appellant went in deep sorrow and did not remember about the proceedings of the case and the judgment passed by the trial court. He, therefore, could not contact his advocate for taking proper steps as per law and the delay in filing the appeal was due to this reason. The respondent resisted the application on the ground that the a


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top