1. The petitioner is aggrieed by an order of Additional Rent Control Tribunal dated 8th January, 2007 whereby he set aside the judgment of ARC dated 27th May, 2004 and allowed the Eiction petition filed by the respondent under Section 14(1)(b) of Delhi Rent Control Act.

2. The facts releant for the purpose of deciding this petition are that the petitioner was a tenant in respect of premises no. 13/39, Arya Samaj Road, Karol Bagh. The respondent found that the premises was in occupation of M/s. Letheria (an undertaking of Punjab Goernment) and the petitioner had sub- let/parted with the possession of premises to M/s. Letheria without obtaining consent in writing of the landlord. A petition under Section 14(1)(b) of Delhi Rent Control Act was preferred. The landlord also got a Local Commissioner appointed for inspection of the property, immediately on filing the Eiction Petition. The Local Commissioner appointed by the Court inspected the premises and filed his report stating that premises was occupied by Sh. Sanjee Kumar, an employee of Letheria (a Punjab Goernment undertaking), who informed him that Mr. R.M. Lal was the Area Manager of Punjab State Leather Deelopment Corporation (

Click Here to Read the rest of this document