SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Del) 1120

SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
PADMAWATI – Appellant
Versus
HARIJAN SEWAK SANGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr.Vijay Tandon, Advocate
Mr.M.K. Kaushik with Mr.Sunil Kumar Advocates

JUDGMENT(ORAL):

1. By this petition under Article 227, the petitioner has assailed anA order of first appellate Court dismissing appeal of the petitioner.

2. The facts relevant for the purposes of deciding this petition are that one H.Kameshwar was working with Harijan Sewak Sangh, respondent, a registered society in the service of down trodden. Due to his being in service with the respondent, he was allotted premises in question for his residence as an incident of employment. He died on 13.3.1982. The petitioners are legal heirs of late H.Kameshwar and are in possession of the premises allotted to H.Kameshwar since his death. After death of H. Kameshwar, one of the sons was given service on compassionate grounds by respondent but he also resigned on 13.7.1984. The legal heirs of H. Kameshwar did not hand over the vacant possession of the premises allotted to H. Kameshwar after his death or after the resignation of his son and continued to be in illegal possession of this premises from 1984 till date on the basis of litigation in costs.

.3. An eviction petition was filed by Harijan Sewak Sangh against the petitioner who are legal heirs of deceased H.Kameshwar. One of the LRs was a








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top