SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
Subhash Chand Goel – Appellant
Versus
Om Prakash Gupta – Respondent
.2. The brief facts relevant for the purpose of deciding this petition are that respondent Om Prakash Gupta had filed a suit against his brother Subhash Chand Goel and others in respect of property No. B-1/26, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi. In the suit he alleged that the property in question measured 400 sq. yards and at the time of execution of sub-lease by the superior lesser i.e. defendant no.6, sublease was granted in the joint names of plaintiff and defendant no.1 in the year 1971. The two brothers thereafter partitioned the plot into two parts and Western portion was taken by defendant no.1 and eastern portion by the plaintiff. Both the brothers raised construction on their parts separately and after construction, occupied their constructed portions separately. Plaintiff alleged that defendant made incomplete construction of a three storeyed house on his portion of plot without obtaining a sanctioned plan from MCD and started living there in few rooms from 1992 onwards and he lived there till 18.1.1996. He then moved to 289 Tarun E
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.