SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Del) 1179

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.R.MIDHA
YOGESH TYAGI – Appellant
Versus
KELA DEVI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr.Anil Kumar Gupta, Advocate
Mr.R.C. Nangia, Advocate

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.

1. Appellant who was the plaintiff, had filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell, Ex.PW-1/1, stated to have been executed by the defendant i.e. the respondent in the appeal on 19.10.2004, agreeing to sell to him the property referred to in the agreement, for a total sale consideration of Rs.16,50,000/- (Rupees Sixteen Lakhs Fifty Thousand only), out of which Rs.3,00,000/- (Rupees Three Lakhs only), was stated to have been paid, as recorded in the agreement, as part sale consideration when Ex.PW-1/1 was executed. It was pleaded that the agreement recorded that the respondent would execute the sale deed by 15.2.2005 and that the appellant made an attempt twice to tender the balance sale consideration of Rs.13,50,000/- on 24.2.2005 and 10.3.2005; receiving no response from the respondent when she did not even respond to a legal notice dated 24.3.2005, Ex.PW-1/3, the appellant had no option but to file the suit.

2. First prayer made in the suit was to specifically enforce the contract between the parties. Alternate prayer was that if specific performance was not granted, as per Clause 1 of the agreement, which stipulated that if respondent di
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top