SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Del) 639

SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
K. K. Manchanda – Appellant
Versus
SD Technical Services P. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. P.S. Bindra, Advocate
Mr. G.S. Raghav with Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Advocates

ORDER

1. This review application has been made by the applicant for review of the order dated 22nd August, 2008 passed by this Court in the instant petition whereby this Court dismissed the CM (Main) petition. The applicant in ground of review stated that this Court while dismissing the petition of the petitioner vide order dated 22nd August 2008, observed that the record clerk cannot be allowed to exhibit the photocopies or computerized details of amount stated in the document since the document was not duly proved. It is submitted that the documents exhibited were not independent documents but annexed as a part of the plaint filed by respondent. He submitted that the plaint along with annexures formed pleadings and if the respondent had taken a particular stand in the pleadings of a case, the petitioner has a right to bring on record the stand taken by respondent in that case. It is submitted by applicant that in the impugned order there is no mention of this fact neither this fact was mentioned by petitioner earlier since documents were independently exhibited. The petitioner wanted to place on record the documents annexed with the plaint of the earlier case but the same were no







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top