MANMOHAN
PRADEEP KUMAR SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
RATNA SHARMA – Respondent
1. Present petition has been filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India challenging the order dated 22nd November, 2006 passed in HMA No. 655/2006 whereby Additional District Judge has granted monthly maintenance to respondent-wife at the rate of Rs. 7,000/-and litigation expenses to the extent of Rs. 8,000/-.
2. Ms. Pinki Anand, learned Senior Counsel for petitioner-husband stated that respondent-wife is an able bodied educated person who is working as a teacher and earning almost Rs. 30,000/- per month from salary and tuition fees. In this connection, she referred to the statement of respondent-broth er, Mr. Ab hishek, wherein he stated a teacher in St. Fiedelis School, Aligarh and is maintaining her She als o referred to state ment of respon de´My sister is working as a Teacher in St. Fiedelis School, Aligarh.
3. Ms. Pin ky An and further stated th at when the maintenance application was filed on 14th September , 2005 , petitioner-hus band was earning gross salary of Rs. 24,35 3/ - and his net income was only Rs. 20,065/ -. In this co ntext, she relied upon a salary certificate issued by petitioner
4. She further stated that petitioner undergone a
Jasbir Kaur Sehgal v. District Judge
Kumaresan v. Aswathi (2002) 2 MLJ 760
Maharani Kesarkunverba v. I.T. Commissioner AIR 1960 SC 1343
Mamta Jaiswal v. Rajesh Jaiswal II (2000) DMC 170
Mangat Mal v. Punni Devi (1995) 6 SCC 88
Manokaran @ Ramamoorthy v. M. Devaki AIR 2003 Mad. 212
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.