SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Del) 218

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
Jaswant Singh - Appellant
Versus
Surinder Kaur Kohli - Respondent
CS(OS) 1559 of 2008
Decided On : 16-02-2009

Advocates Appeared:
Ms. Kiran Suri with Mr. Purvesh Buttan and Ms. Aparna Bhat, Advocates
Mr. Vineet Bahl, Advocate

Headnote:Court Fees Act. 1870 Section 7 (iv) (c) - Suit for cancellation of the sale deed of property - Suit in the form of declaration that the deed was void It implicitly amounts to a claim over the property already sold and possessions delivered - Plaintiff cannot affix a court fee of Rs. 20 - Suit is governed by Section 7(iv) (c) of the Court Fees Act and not by Schedule II, Article 17(3) - Property according to plaintiff is of Rs. 85 lac - Held that plaintiff is liable to pay Court fees on this amount.

       

JUDGMENT

1. This suit has been filed by the plaintiff for declaration of sale deed executed by the plaintiff in favour of the defendant as null and void and thereafter cancellation of the sale deed dated 23rd January 2008 executed by the plaintiff in favour of the defendant at the Sub Registrar?s Office vide Registration No.422, Additional Book No.1 Vol. 877, Pages 109 to 114.

2. It is submitted by the plaintiff that the value of the property transferred by the virtue of the sale deed was Rs.85 lac and out of that Rs.25 lac was the sale consideration mentioned in the sale deed and Rs.60 lac was to be paid in cash by the defendant by the same evening. He took the plea that the defendant played foul play and did not hand over the cash and also did not hand over the cheques as mentioned in the sale deed. The plaintiff has valued the suit for the purpose of jurisdiction at Rs.85 lacs but for the purpose of court fees, he has not valued the suit and stated that the Court fee paid as Rs.20 only. While issuing summons of the suit, this Court had left the question of court fee open and allowed registration of the instant plaint.

3. The statement of plaintiff under Order 10 CPC was recorded by this Court on 13th January 2009. The statement tendered by the plaintiff is not in conformity with the plea taken by the plaintiff in the suit. While in the suit, the plaintiff has taken the plea that the sale deed was executed as a security and the property was to be transferred back. In his statement under Order 10 CPC, he has not taken this stand and rather had taken the plea that he had entered into an oral agreement initially and he had executed the sale deed since he was under debt and he needed finance as they had to pay money to State Bank of India, Punjab National Bank, Rajasthan Bank and Syndicate Bank. The total money payable by him and his son to various banks was around Rs.5 crore. He stated that he had mortgaged this property to Allahabad Bank and the title deeds of the property were lying with Allahabad Bank.

4. Some of the provisions of the sale deed executed by the plaintiff are as under: ?NOW THIS SALE DEED WITNESSETH AS UNDER: 1. That the Vendor has received the entire sale consideration i.e. Rs.25,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five only), from the Vendee, details are as under: (i) Rs.8,00,000/- vide Cheque No.076298 dated 23.01.2008 (ii) Rs.8,00,000/- vide Cheque No.076299 dated 23.01.2008 (iii) Rs.9,00,000/-vide Cheque No.076300 dated 23.01.2008 Drawn on Punjab and Sind Bank, Mota Singh Branch, Guru Harkishan Nagar, New Delhi-110 087 which is full and final settlement, prior to the execution of this sale deed and the Vendor thereby admit and acknowledge the receipt of the same before the sub- registrar, Delhi, at the time of presentation/ registration of this Sale deed and the Vendor of his/ her free will, sound, mind, good health and without any pressure and/or influence of any one, hereby sell, convey, transfer and assign the aforesaid property to and in the name of the Vendee free from all encumbrances, TO HAVE AND HOLD the same by the Vendee absolutely.

2. That in consideration of above amount, the Vendor do hereby absolutely assigns, sells, conveys and transfers all his/her rights of the ownership, titles and interests whatsoever in the said floor under sale, together with all ways, paths, passages, rights, benefits, easements, options, privileges and appurtenances thereto unto the said Vendee and the Vendee have hereinafter become the absolute owner of the above mentioned floor under the sale and the Vendee shall enjoy all the absolute and exclusive rights of ownership, titles and interest of the said floor without any interruption, disturbance and demand whatsoever from the Vendor or his heirs, successors, administrations, survivors and assignees etc. 3. That the Vendor has relinquished /released all his rights, title interest of the said floor in favour of the said vendee, in all respects and the vendor has no right, shar






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top