ANIL KUMAR
Sri Kishan – Appellant
Versus
Ram Kishan – Respondent
1. The plaintiff has filed the above-noted suit for partition of the properties mentioned in Annexure A & B to the plaint, a declaration that the sale of the properties mentioned in Annexure C of the plaint is null and void and permanent injunction against defendants No.1 to 5 restraining them from creating any third party interests in the plaintiff’s share of the properties mentioned in Annexure A and from interfering with the peaceful possession of the plaintiff of the properties mentioned in Annexure B. The reliefs claimed by the plaintiff are as follow:
(a) Pass a decree for declaration in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants No.1 to 5, their representative, associates, agents and assigned etc., thereby declaring that the plaintiff is entitled to 1/6th portion of all the property as mentioned in Annexure –A along with the plaint;
(b) Pass a decree for partition in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants No.1 to 5 and their representatives, associates, agents and assigned etc., thereby effecting partition of the property as mentioned Annexure -A annexed to the plaint.
(c) Pass a decree for possession in favour of the plaintiff and against
Bajah V. Maheswara Rao v. Bajah V. Bajeswara Rao : 1967 (1) Mlj 175
CDR. Bhupinder Singh Rekhi v. C.S. Rekhi and Others : 76 (1998) DLT 257
Hatti v. Sunder Singh : AIR 1971 SC 2320
Jai Devi & Ors. v. Jodhi Ram & Ors. : 6 (1970) DLT 549
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.