SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Del) 519

ANIL KUMAR
Sri Kishan – Appellant
Versus
Ram Kishan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr.Sunil Satyarathi and Mr.Raman Gandhi, Advocates
Mr.R.K. Dahiya, Advocate

ANIL KUMAR, J.

1. The plaintiff has filed the above-noted suit for partition of the properties mentioned in Annexure A & B to the plaint, a declaration that the sale of the properties mentioned in Annexure C of the plaint is null and void and permanent injunction against defendants No.1 to 5 restraining them from creating any third party interests in the plaintiff’s share of the properties mentioned in Annexure A and from interfering with the peaceful possession of the plaintiff of the properties mentioned in Annexure B. The reliefs claimed by the plaintiff are as follow:

(a) Pass a decree for declaration in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants No.1 to 5, their representative, associates, agents and assigned etc., thereby declaring that the plaintiff is entitled to 1/6th portion of all the property as mentioned in Annexure –A along with the plaint;

(b) Pass a decree for partition in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants No.1 to 5 and their representatives, associates, agents and assigned etc., thereby effecting partition of the property as mentioned Annexure -A annexed to the plaint.

(c) Pass a decree for possession in favour of the plaintiff and against







































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top