SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Del) 508

ANIL KUMAR
Surjeet Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Krishan Bhandari – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr.M.S. Mishra, Advocate
Mr.P.K. Rawal and Mr.Ajay Bahl, Advocates

ANIL KUMAR, J. (ORAL)

This is a petition for execution of compromise decree passed in Suit No.436 of 1986.

The plaintiff had filed the suit for rendition of account, injunction and recovery of money which was settled between the plaintiff, Shri Krishan Bhandari and M/s.Saggu Engineering Works and others and an application under Order XXIII rule 3 dated 27th August, 1987 was filed. Under the settlement, the plaintiff was permitted to be in possession of the areas which was in his exclusive possession and it was agreed that the plaintiff/decree holder shall be free to carry on business. The plaintiff was, however, liable to pay a sum of Rs.4,000/- per month from 1st August, 1987 to the defendant for having possession of the premises and consequent thereto all the previous claims between the parties were settled and concluded. A writ petition being CWP No.1086/1986 was also pending between the parties where defendants were a party and the defendants had consented to continuation of electricity connection already granted by Delhi Electricity Supply Undertaking in the name of plaintiff.

The parties had also agreed that the defendants will not cause any obstruction or objection to c





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top