IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
SANJIV KHANNA
PUSHPENDRA SINGH DIWANIYAN - Appellant
Versus
UOI - Respondent
W.P.(C) 7387/2008
Decided On : 04-08-2009
Date of Birth - Passport Change - The court discussed the authority of the Passport authorities to make necessary corrections in case a wrong entry has been made, and whether a declaratory order from a First Class Judicial Magistrate is necessary for changing the date of birth in a passport.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought to change his date of birth in his passport after retiring from service, based on a school certificate. The respondents insisted on a declaratory order from a First Class Judicial Magistrate to effect the change.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the Passport authorities have the jurisdiction and authority to make necessary corrections in case a wrong entry has been made, and that a declaratory order from a First Class Judicial Magistrate is not necessary for changing the date of birth in a passport.
Issues: The main issue was whether the respondents can consider and examine the request of the petitioner for change of date of birth as recorded in his passport, and whether a declaratory order from a First Class Judicial Magistrate is necessary for changing the date of birth in a passport.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the provisions of Section 21 of the General Clauses Act and the decision of the Bombay High Court, which held that the Passport authorities have the requisite power to examine any claim for change of date of birth in view of Section 21 of the General Clauses Act on merits.
Final Decision: The court directed the respondents to examine the claim of the petitioner for change of date of birth without expressing any opinion on the merits of the claim, leaving it open to the respondents to reject or accept the claim.
1. Petitioner wants to change his date of birth as recorded in his passport from 15th August, 1950 to 15th August, 1953. This is peculiar as the petitioner had thought and had asked for change of his date of birth, allegedly on the basis of school certificate of Vth Class, after he has already retired from service. It is not possible to decipher what advantage the petitioner may gain by changing his date of birth. However, I need not go into the said aspect in detail, as the only question involved in the present writ petition is whether the respondents can consider and examine the request of the petitioner for change of date of birth as recorded in his passport.
2.The respondents in the counter affidavit have relied upon 29th
Circulars dated 18th April, 2001 and October, 2007. Relevant portions of the said Circulars read as under:-
Circular dated 18.04.2001 on the basis of a supportive document issued by one competent authority i.e. School/educational
authority and the applicant subsequently requests for a change on the basis of a certificate issued by another competent authority i.e. municipal authorities resulting in conflicting sources of valid proof, the PIA should direct the applicant to obtain a civil order from a competent court of jurisdiction, certifying the valid date of birth/place Circular dated 29.10.2007 destroyed. PIAs could use their discretion in correction of date of birth without a Court Order, where such correction is only in months (not more than two years) and applicants provide satisfactory explanation that the same document(s) was provided at the time of initial passport application. Fresh fees will be charged.
(d) Where the initial entry has been made on the basis of a supportive document issued by one competent authority i.e. School/educational authority and the applicant subsequently requests for a change on the basis of a certificate issued by another competent authority i.e. Municipal authorities etc., resulting in conflicting documents for valid proof, the PIA should direct the applicant to procure an order from a First Class Judicial Magistrate, to effect the change as per Passport Manual 2001 (In some States, this function is discharged by
3. Date of birth is recorded in the passport of the petitioner on the basis of his school leaving certificate. Therefore the said clauses of the
Circular will apply. In terms of the said Circulars, the respondents are insisting upon declaratory order from a First Class Judicial Magistrate to
effect the change as per Passport Manual, 2001.
4. A similar controversy has arisen before the Bombay High Court in the case of Jigar Harish Shah versus Union of India AIR 2001
Bom. 60. Bombay High Court dissented from the view taken by the Kerala High Court and held that in view of Section 21 of the General Clauses Act, the Passport authorities have requisite jurisdiction and authority to make necessary corrections in case a wrong entry has
been made. Accordingly, it was observed as under:-
provisions of S.21 of the General Clauses Act have been brought to our notice and when we see that correction in the Passport in relation to the entries therein including in relation to the date of birth can be made by the Passport authority itself having regard to the provisions of S.21 of the General Clauses Act, we do not feel it proper to refer the matter to the Judicial magistrate whose Courts, we are aware, are already overburdened and further in particular when the Judicial magistrates have not been conferred with such a jurisdiction under any law. We, therefore, instead of issuing a direction to the Judicial Magistrate in this matter, direct the Passport Authority itself to hold an enquiry on hearing the petitioner in correct date of birth and in case the Passport Authority is satisfied with regard to the claim put forth by the petitioner, we further order it to effect the necessary change in the Passport issued in favour of the petitioner. Petition is allowed in the abo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.