SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Del) 437

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA
DHARAM PAL – Appellant
Versus
DELHI ADMINISTRATION – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. I.S.Dahiya, Advocate
Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Advocate

SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.

1. By this petition, the petitioners are seeking the implementation of a policy of the Delhi Administration to allot alternative residential plots in lieu of land compulsorily acquired for the planned development of Delhi. The relevant facts are as follows:-

.2. To begin with, four brothers, namely, Harphool, Lakhi Ram, Ram Nath and Indraj, jointly owned agricultural land measuring 14 bighas 5 biswas situated in revenue estate of village Nangloi, Delhi. On 4th March, 1963, this land was notified under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and, ultimately, on 4th March, 1967, award No. 1957, inter alia, pertaining to this land was announced and compensation awarded by the Land Acquisition Collector was received by all the four brothers. On 11th August, 1973, one of the brothers, Harphool died. He bequeathed all benefits arising out of the aforesaid land in favour of two of his nephews,

.namely, Dharam Pal and Jai Pal, both of whom are the sons of his brother Indraj. Consequent upon this, even the compensation assessed later on by the court towards the late Harphool’s share was paid to them.

3. On 8th August, 1986, the second petitioner Jai Pa


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top