SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
Nisha Raj – Appellant
Versus
Pratap K. Kaula – Respondent
Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J.
1. The plaintiffs the purchasers have filed the present suit for specific performance of Agreement to sell dated 30-09-1986 (Ex. PW1/2 ) of the property situated at A-2, Pamposh Enclave, New Delhi admeasuring 698.60 sq. yds (hereinafter referred to as the said property). The defendant Nos. 1-4 in the present case are the legal heirs of Smt. Vijay Malini Kaula, the seller, of the said property.
2. A perpetual sub-lease (Ex. P1), duly registered, dated 05-02-1973 was executed in favor of the said seller by the President of India as the Lesser and the Kashmir Cooperative House Building society Ltd. as the lessee for a consideration of Rs. 13,105 towards development charges.
3. The said seller constructed a residential house with a covered area of 3723.08 sq. ft. at the cost of Rs. 2,48,000 on the said property (being a residential plot of land) for which an occupancy certificate was issued by the DDA on 29-12-1984. Later the seller decided to permanently settle in Nilgiris, Tamil Nadu and thereforee appointed one Col. Janki Raina as her attorney by way of a Special Power of Attorney dated 13-12-1979 (Ex. PW1/1). On 01-03-1985, the said property was let
Appropriate Authority v. Tanvi Trading and Credits P. Ltd. (1991) 191 ITR 307
Devalsab (Dead) by Lrs. v. Ibrahimsab F. Karajagi and Anr. AIR 2005 SC 1940
Krishnaswamy S. Pd. and Anr. v. Union of India (UOI) and Ors. (2006) 3 SCC 286
Motilal v. Nanhelal AIR 1930 P.C. 287
Mrs. Chandnee Widya Wati Madden v. C.L. Katial AIR 1964 SC 978
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.