ARUNA SURESH, PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
Ashok Kumar @ Govind – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Pradeep Nandrajog, J.
1. Case of the prosecution is that the appellants and co-accused Jeet Kaur (who has been acquitted after the trial) hatched a conspiracy on 16.9.2001 to kidnap for ransom Master Rishabh and Master Shubham, twins aged 4 1/2 years and in furtherance thereof on 17.9.2001 kidnapped Master Rishabh and Master Shubham as also abducted the driver Sunil, employed by Shri Rajiv Aggarwal father of Master Rishabh and Master Shubham. That, in furtherance of the conspiracy, to eliminate they being identified, since appellant Ashok was also employed as a driver by Shri Rajiv Aggarwal and hence driver Sunil knew appellant Ashok, driver Sunil was murdered and body hidden in a cane field next to a canal in village Silarpur and as per the conspiracy ransom in sum of Rupees One Crore for each child was demanded. As per the prosecution, the conspirators gave effect to the conspiracy inasmuch as on 17.9.2001 kidnapped the two children and abducted the driver and thereafter murdered the driver as also demanded ransom but their mission failed because they were apprehended.
2. It is not in dispute that Master Rishabh and Master Shubham were students of Bal Bharti School, Sect
State v. Navjot Sandhu 2005 (11) SCC 600
State of Bombay v. Kathi Kalu Oghad and Ors. 1962 (3) SCR 10
State of U.P. v. Rambabu Mishra AIR 1980 SC 791
State (Delhi Administration) v. Pali Ram AIR 1979 SC 14
State of Bombay v. Kathi Kalu Oghad AIR 1961 SC 1808
T. Subbiah v. S.K.D. Ramaswamy Nadar AIR 1970 Mad. 85
Farid Ahmed v. the State AIR 1960 Cal 32
Sukhvinder Singh and Ors. v. State of Punjab 1994 (5) SCC 152
Sardar Sardul Singh Kavaesher v. State of Maharashtra AIR 1965 SC 682
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.