SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Del) 678

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Honble Judge: Shiv Narayan Dhingra, J.
Appellants: Woodfun
Vs.
Respondent: Union of India (UOI)
O.M.P. 439/2006
Decided On: 29.05.2009

Advocates appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: Sandeep Sharma, Adv.
For Respondents/Defendant: Preeti Dalal, Adv.

Charging exorbitant fee is not a ground for termination of the mandate of the arbitrator.

Headnote:

Arbitration & Conciliation Act - Termination of Arbitrator's Mandate - The court held that charging exorbitant fee is not a ground for termination of the mandate of the arbitrator. The respondent shall bear the costs of the arbitration if the present arbitrator continues.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought to terminate the mandate of the arbitrator on the ground that the arbitrator had asked the petitioner to pay half of the amount of his fee as an interim bill.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that charging exorbitant fee is not a ground for termination of the mandate of the arbitrator. If the present arbitrator continues, the respondent shall bear the costs of the arbitration.

Issues: The issue was whether the arbitrator's mandate could be terminated on the ground of higher fees being charged by him.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on Sections 14 and 15 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, which lay down specific grounds on which the mandate of the arbitrator can be terminated. Charging exorbitant fee was not considered a valid ground for termination.

Final Decision: The petition was disposed of with the decision that if the present arbitrator continues, the respondent shall bear the costs of the arbitration.

JUDGMENT

Shiv Narayan Dhingra, J.

1. This petition has been made by the petitioner under Section 34 read with Sections 11, 38 and 39 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, "the Act") with a prayer that this Court should terminate the mandate of the Arbitrator Mr. C.B. Lal on the ground that the learned Arbitrator had asked the petitioner to pay to him half of the amount of Rs. 2,58,700/-, as the interim bill of his fee.

2. The arbitrator in this case was to be appointed by respondent Union of India, who initially appointed Shri Y.P.C. Dange as arbitrator. After sometime Mr. Dange resigned and in his place Shri A.K. Singhal was appointed as the arbitrator who entered upon the reference and proceeded with the case till completion of pleadings. Thereafter, he also resigned and Mr. C.B. Lal, the present arbitrator was appointed. Mr. C.B. Lal fixed hearing of the matter on 31st July 2006 and on that date asked each of the parties to deposit half of his bill of professional fees and costs. The petitioner has placed on record hand written note of Mr. C.B. Lal.

3. In this case, since it is Union of India who appointed the present arbitrator and the earlier arbitrators, in terms of arbitration agreement the arbitrator so appointed should have been a serving officer and in case it was not a serving officer and was a retired officer, Union of India should bear the expenses of the arbitration. The arbitrator, while passing the award can always make an order qua costs. The mandate of the arbitrator cannot be terminated on the ground of higher fees being charged by him. Section 14 and 15 lay down specific grounds on which the mandate of the arbitrator can be terminated. Charging exorbitant fee is not a ground for termination of mandate of the arbitrator.

4. If the present arbitrator continues, the respondent shall bear the costs of the arbitration and the arbitrator while passing the award may make an order in respect of the costs of the arbitration.

The petition stands disposed of in above terms.


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top