S.RAVINDRA BHAT
Raj Khurana – Appellant
Versus
Amrawati Madan – Respondent
S. Ravindra Bhat, J.
1. This order will dispose of the plaintiffs application for temporary ad-interim injunction, i.e. IA 5434/2008. The plaintiff sues the defendant for declaration, recovery of possession mesne profits and permanent injunction. The plaintiff and defendant Nos. 2 and 3 are sons of late Parkash Chand Khurana; (hereafter called "the late father") the first defendant a daughter of the said late father. It is not disputed that the said father of the parties, died on 23-3-2007.
.2. The facts necessary for deciding the application are that according to the plaintiff, the late father had, at the time of his death, bequeathed his assets and properties, by excluding the first defendant. The bequest was in favour of the plaintiffs brothers, i.e the second and third defendant, in respect of a factory
.situated at 700 sq. yards, a tenanted premises at Samaipur, Delhi. It is alleged that under the will, the testator bequeathed the leasehold residential property, at 27, Rajendra Park, exclusively in his favour. The plaintiff contends that exclusive tenancy rights were bequeathed in his favour in respect of a godown at 48176/6, Katra Subhash Chandni Chowk, and rights wer
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.