MANMOHAN
Prof. Ram Prakash – Appellant
Versus
D. N. Shrivastava – Respondent
Manmohan, J.
1. Present petition has been filed under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India challenging the orders dated 05th July, 2006 and 16th September, 2006 passed by the Additional Rent Control Tribunal, Delhi.
2. Since for the last five hearings, none has appeared for the respondent despite the respondents Counsel having been specifically informed by Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Amicus Curiae, I am left with no other option but to proceed with the hearing of the matter. Accordingly, the present case is taken up for final disposal.
3. Petitioner-landlord who appears in person submitted that the Additional Rent Control Tribunal has decided the matter contrary to the explicit directions given by this Court vide judgment dated 01st December, 2005 in CM(M) 661/2003 while remanding the matter back to the Tribunal.
4. Briefly stated the material facts of this case are that petitioner-landlord let out one room with attached WC/bathroom on Barsati (top floor) of property bearing No. B-48, South Extension, Part-I, New Delhi-110049 to the respondent at a monthly rent of Rs. 700/-. Rent was payable in advance for each month on or before the 7th day of the concerned month.
5. Since
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.