A.K.SIKRI
Indira Uppal @ Lalita Uppal – Appellant
Versus
J. N. Uppal – Respondent
1. The parties to these proceedings are four brothers viz. Mr. J.N. Uppal, Mr. G.K. Uppal, Mr. P.N. Uppal and Dr. Harish Uppal as well as their sister Ms. Indira Uppal. The disputes are in relation to two properties, namely, 20 Todarmal Road, New Delhi – 110 001 and 9A/50, WEA, Karol Bagh, New Delhi – 110 005 (hereinafter referred to as the „Todarmal property? and „Karol Bagh property? respectively). I shall record the events, as they happened, chronologically and while recording those facts, background of various litigations which erupted between the parties would also get surfaced.
2. As mentioned above, the parties were owners of the aforesaid two properties. In the year 1988, the parties desired that these properties be partitioned. Document dated 29.3.1989 was written as per which partition of the said properties was effected on 17/18.7.1988.
3. In the year 1994, however, Ms. Indira Uppal filed suit for partition, which was registered as Suit No. 146/1994. She impleaded her four brothers as defendants in the said suit. In this suit, she stated that she was a physically handicapped lady with 80% disability. Father and mother of the parties expired on 1.12.1
ML Shubh Ram Shetty and Ors. v. M.L.Nagappa Shetty 2002 (4) SCC 743
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.