2009 Supreme(Del) 500
High Court of Delhi
THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. AJIT PRAKASH SHAH & THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR
Delhi Medical Association & Others
Versus
Union Of India & Others
WP (C) No. 4233 of 1993, LPA No. 132 of 2008, WP (C) No. 5782 of 2007, WP (C) No. 6788 of 2007, WP (C) No. 6789 of 2007, WP (C) No. 6795 of 2007, WP (C) No. 7290 of 2007, WP (C) No. 8258 of 2007, WP (C) No. 8337 of 2007, WP (C) No. 8833 of 2007, WP (C) No. 8835 of 2007, WP (C) No. 8908 of 2007, WP (C) No. 9384 of 2007, WP (C) No. 524 of 2008, WP (C) No. 909 of 2008, WP (C) No. 910 of 2008, WP (C) No. 911 of 2008, WP (C) No. 912 of 2008, WP (C) No. 915 of 2008, WP (C) No. 1018 of 2008, WP (C) No.
Decided on : 24-04-2009
For the Petitioners:S.P. Kalra, Senior Advocate with Praveen Chauhan and Anmol Sinha, Advocate.
For the Respondents:S.D. Salwan, Advocate for GNCTD Vivek Kumar Tandon with Daiyan Hussain, Advocate for Directorate of Health Services.
Headnote:Delhi Nursing Homes Registration Act 1953 Section 3 - Delhi Nursing Home (Amendment) Rules 1992 - Rule 3 - Rule if ultra virus the Act - Prohibition to carry on nursing home without registration - Requirement of having to conform to the MPD land use norms cannot be said to be unreasonable or arbitrary - Writ petitions, dismissed.
S. Muralidhar, J.
1.1 These petitions and appeals raise similar questions and are accordingly being disposed of by this common judgment. The lead petition, Writ Petition (C) No. 4233 of 1993 by the Delhi Medical Association seeks a declaration that Rule 3 of the Delhi Nursing Home (Amendment) Rules 1992 is ultra vires the Delhi Nursing Homes Registration Act 1953 („Act?) and is also arbitrary and discriminatory and therefore violative of Articles 14 and 19 (1) (g) of the Constitution of India. The other prayer in the writ petition is for a direction to the Respondents not to give effect to the said Rule 3 and to register all nursing homes which are eligible for registration under the Act without insisting on the fulfillment of the conditions prescribed under the impugned Rule 3.
1.2 It was submitted at the outset by counsel for the petitioners that with the changes brought about by the Master Plan for Delhi (MPD) 2021 and the introduction of the mixed land use norms, the questions arising in the present batch of petitions ought to be left unanswered and that the petitioners? case be directed to be considered by the Respondents under the new norms. This Court is not inclined to accept this plea since the principal questions concerning the Act are bound to recur notwithstanding the new MPD norms. The petitioners have been protected from adverse consequences of the law on account of the interim orders which have operated for over a decade. It is therefore important and necessary for this Court to deal with the contentions raised on merits.
The Provisions of the Act and the progressive changes to the Rules
2. The Delhi Nursing Homes Registration Act, 1953 (‘Act’) was enacted to provide for the registration and inspection of nursing homes in the State of Delhi. Under Section 2
(iv) of the Act, a nursing home has been defined thus:
“(iv) Nursing Home means any premises used or intended to be used for the reception of persons suffering from any sickness injury or infirmity and the providing of treatment and nursing for them and includes a maternity home, and the expression `carry on nursing home’ means to receive persons in a nursing home for, any of the aforesaid purposes and to provide treatment or nursing for them.”
3. Section 3 prohibits the running of a nursing home without registration. The said provision reads as under:
“3. Prohibition to carry on nursing home without registration – No person shall carry on a nursing home unless he has been duly registered in respect of such nursing home and the registration in respect has not been cancelled under section 7.
Provided that nothing in this section shall apply in the case of a nursing home which is in existence at the date of the commencement of this Act, for a period of three months from such date or if an application for registration is made within that period in accordance with the provisions of section 4 until such application is finally disposed of.”
4. Under Section 7, the supervising authority may at any time cancel the registration in respect of a nursing home on the same ground which would entitled the supervising authority to refuse an application for registration or if any person is convicted under the Act or of an offence in respect of that nursing home.
5. The Delhi Nursing Homes Registration Rules 1953 (‘Rules’) sets out the procedure for applying for the registration. The Rules were further amended in 1966. Therein a schedule was added with reference to Rule 14. The Schedule sets out the requirement of the nursing homes including the buildings, water supply, health, clothing, sanitary requirements of staff and other equipments. Importantly, as far as buildings are concerned, clause (1) (b)(i) stipulates that “The building used for the nursing home shall comply with the relevant municipal bye laws in force from time to time”. In the 1992 amendment Rule 3(i) further amended to read as under:
“(i) The building used for the Nursing Homes comply with th