BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J

1. The present appeal on behalf of the appellants Geeta and Dropti, who are daughter and mother respectively, is directed against the judgment dated 14.09.1993 delivered by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi whereby the appellant Dropti has been found guilty of having committed the offence of murder of her son-in-law Madan Lal, punishable under Section 302 IPC and appellant Geeta was found guilty for the offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 109 IPC for having assisted her mother, appellant Dropti and another Ghanshyam (who has been declared to be a proclaimed offender), in the said murder of her husband Madan Lal. They were both convicted primarily on the basis of Exhibit PW10/A which was accepted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge as the true and correct dying declaration made by the deceased Madan Lal. By a separate order dated 27.09.1993 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, the appellants were sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and also to pay a fine of Rs 5,000/- each and, in default thereof, they were required to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for three months each. The appel