SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Del) 1232

HIMA KOHLI
Pratap – Appellant
Versus
Shiv Shanker – Respondent


ADVOCATES APPEARED:
For the Petitioner:Rabindra Singh, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Dinesh Goyal, Advocate.

Judgment :

HIMA KOHLI, J.

1. This appeal arises from the judgment dated 31.07.1998 passed by the trial court, dismissing a suit for partition instituted by the appellant, Shri Pratap against his father, Shri Shiv Shanker (defendant in the court below). In the plaint, the appellant sought a decree against the respondent in respect of his one half share in a residential premises bearing No. 486, Bhola Nath Nagar, Shahdara, Delhi, constructed on a plot of land measuring 125 square yards. The case of the appellant, as set out in the plaint was that the aforesaid property was an ancestral property, which the respondent had got in partition amongst his other brothers and that the appellant, being the son of the respondent, was a coparcener in the suit property and thus, entitled to a decree of partition to the extent of the half share therein. It was also averred that the respondent had deserted his wife, Smt. Sukh Devi, who is the mother of the appellant and the appellant and that he was threatening to sell the suit property, thus compelling the appellant to institute the aforesaid suit for partition.

2. After entering appearance, the respondent controverted the stand of the appellant a























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top