SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
MCD – Appellant
Versus
KAMLA VALVES MANUFACTURING – Respondent
1. During pendency of the suit under Sections 14 and 15 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, the defendant no.1 filed an IA No.3990/00 raising objections against the award. These objections of the objector/applicant were dismissed in default on 10th April, 2001. The applicant filed an OA No.4678/01 under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC to set aside the order dated 10th April, 2001. Again none appeared to prosecute this OA No.4678/01 and this application was dismissed in default on 3rd September, 2002. Applicant then filed second application, i.e., IA No.10053/02 under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC to set aside the order dated 10th April, 01. This application was also dismissed in default on 30th October, 2002. From 30th October, 2002 till 2006 the applicant kept sleeping coolly. Then third IA No.13816/06 under Order 9 rule 13 was made by the applicant for setting aside the order dated 10th April, 2001. This application was also dismissed in default on 24th September, 2007 and thereafter applicant made two applications bearing IA No.13815/06 under Section 5 to condone the delay in filing fourth application no.13816/06 under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC. This application 13815/06 was dismissed in default on 24th Se
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.