SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA,J.

.1. This suit was fixed for recording of statements of parties before framing of issues, on 4th October, 2005. On that day counsel for plaintiff, defendant no. 1, defendant no. 2 and defendants no. 3 and 4 were present and during the course of hearing, the parties agreed to enter into a compromise for settlement of the dispute raised in the suit. The terms of settlement agreed between the counsel of parties during the course of hearing were got recorded by the counsel and formed part of the order dated 4th October, 2005. After recording the terms of settlement, this Court observed that the parties shall abide by the terms of the settlement as the same were commonly accepted by each one of them. The Court was informed that the parties shall make a written compromise application on the basis of agreed terms as recorded in the order and the case was adjourned for disposal of the compromise application on 10th November, 2005. On 10th November 2005 counsel for parties appeared and sought more time to file the required application and the case was adjourned to 14th December, 2005. On 14th December, 2005 again adjournment was sought on the same ground and t