S.MURALIDHAR
DHARAMBIR – Appellant
Versus
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION – Respondent
Dr. S. MURALIDHAR, J.
Introduction
1. 1.1 Questions of law concerning supply of copies of documents, gathered by the prosecution during investigation, to an accused person at the pre-charge stage arise for consideration in these petitions. It involves the interpretation of Sections 173 (5) and 207 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 (CrPC), Sections 3 and 65B of the Indian Evidence Act 1872 (EA) and Sections 2 (o) read with Section 2 (t) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (IT Act).
2. 1.2 In order to appreciate the issues that arise a brief background is being set out. The petitioners here are persons accused of offences under Section 120-B IPC and under Sections 7 to 12, 13 (2) read with 13(1) (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (PC Act) in four different cases. In the charge sheets filed in the four cases, the prosecution has stated that as part of the investigation, intercepted telephonic conversations between the accused persons were recorded on four hard discs (HDs) in the computer systems kept at the office of the Special Unit (SU) of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in New Delhi. The charge sheets further state that these conversations took
Ashok Kumar Aggarwal v. CBI 2007 (4) JCC 2429 : 2007 (98) DRJ 80
Hindustan Construction Company Ltd. v. Union of India AIR 1967 SC 526
Pooran Mal v. Director of Inspection (Investigation)
Shakuntala v. State 139 (2007) DLT 178
State of Bihar v. Ramesh Singh (1977) 4 SCC 39
State of Orissa v. Debendra Nath Padhi (2005) 1 SCC 568
State v. Navjot Sandhu (2005) 11 SCC 600
Superintendent & Remembrancer v. Anil Kumar Bhunja (1979) 4 SCC 274
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.