SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Del) 166

REVA KHETRAPAL
DIR. GEN. WORKS CPWD – Appellant
Versus
DAVINDER SINGH – Respondent


Advocates appeared
Through:Mr.Pankaj Batra, Advocate
Through:Mr. Varun Prasad, Advocate

Judgment

DR. MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, CJ (ORAL):

C.M. No.402/2008 (exemption)

Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of.

LPA 13/2008 and CM Nos. 400/2008(delay) and 401/2008(stay).

1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 18th April, 2007 passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing the writ petition of the appellant and upholding the award passed by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court-II, New Delhi(hereinafter called the Tribunal).

2. The respondent was initially employed on 26th June, 1982 as a Wireman on muster roll and was posted in the Asian Games, Electrical Division-I, CPWD, Nehru Stadium, New Delhi. His services were terminated but the appellants themselves reinstated the respondent with effect from 23rd November,1991 with full back wages and all the consequential benefits. The respondent is a qualified Electrician with a Diploma from ITI, and he has also licence of Wireman, Grade-II. There were about 50 workers working in his category as Wiremen, who were junior to him, who have been regularized. Specifically the case of Shri Hari Shankar was pleaded, who although was junior to the respondent an












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top