T.S.THAKUR, VEENA BIRBAL
DEEPAK RESORTS & HOTELS PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
T.S. Thakur, J
More than 15 years have rolled by since the Supreme Court first expressed its serious concern about the quality of environment in the National Capital Region of Delhi. Such was the failure on the part of the Delhi Development Authority, the MCD, the Central Pollution Control Board as also the Delhi Pollution Control Committee in the discharge of their duties that the court castigated them for their inaction in the matter in M.C. Mehta Versus Union of India, 1992 (3) SCC 256. Referring to a World Health Organization study, the court observed that utter disregard to environment has placed Delhi in an unenviable position of being the world’s third grubbiest and most polluted and unhealthy city. The court observed :
“We are conscious that environmental changes are the inevitable consequence of industrial development in our country, but at the same time the quality of environment cannot be permitted to be damaged by polluting the Air, Water and Land to such an extent that it becomes a health-hazard for the residents of the area. We are constrained to record that Delhi Development Authority, Municipal Corporation of Delhi, Central Pollution Control Board and Delhi P
M.C. Mehta v. Union of India 1992 (3) SCC 256
Jai Narain and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors. 1996 (1) SCC 9
State of UP v. Pista Devi AIR 1986 SC 2025
Union of India and Ors. v. Praveen Gupta and Ors. 1997 (9) SCC 78
First Land Acquisition Collector v. Nirodhi Prakash Gangoli and Anr. 2002 (4) SCC 160
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.