SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Del) 339

P.K.BHASIN
PYARE LAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates appeared
Mr. K.B. Andley, Senior Advocate with Mr. M.L. Yadav, Advocate.
Mr. M.N. Dudeja, APP

Judgment

P.K.BHASIN, J:

1. This appeal takes exception to the judgment dated 11.03.1999 and order dated 12.03.1999 passed by the learned Special Judge, Delhi in Sessions Case No. CC-169/1994 whereby he was convicted under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ) and was sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year and also to pay a fine of Rs.5000/-with a default stipulation for his conviction under Section 7 and under Section 13(1)(d) was awarded rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years and also to pay a fine of Rs.8000/-with a default stipulation.

2. The relevant facts leading to the prosecution of the appellant, who while posted as an Assistant Sub-Inspector of Police(ASI) at Preet Vihar police station was apprehended by the Anti-Corruption Branch officials accepting bribe from the complainant(PW-2), have been noticed by the learned trial court in para nos. 2 and 3 of its judgment and the same are being reproduced hereunder:-(2) On 9-5-1992, P.W.2 Brij Mohan went to the Anti-Corruption Branch and gave his complaining statement Ex. PW2/A. Brij Mohan alleged that his brother Ravinder Chhibbar had been m

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top