SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Del) 2117

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
HONBLE MR. JUSTICE MUKUL MUDGAL , HONBLE MR. JUSTICE J.P. SINGH, JJ.
KALI RAM ..... Appellant
VERSUS
UOI & ANR ..... Respondent
LA.APP. 631/2006
Decided On : NOVEMBER 18, 2006

Advocates Appeared:
Through:Ch. Roop Chand, Advocate.
Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar for LAC.

Headnote:Land Acquisition Act, 1894

       Section 54 - Appeal against award of ADJ fixing market value of land situated in village Bakkarwala - Market value already enhanced to Rs.1,32,000/-. by High Court in earlier case - Market value in the present case fixed accordingly - Held that the appellant would not be entitled to interest for the period of delay in filing the appeal.

Mukul Mudgal, J. (Oral)

1. This land acquisition appeal under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, (herein after referred to as “the Act”) is directed against the judgment and decree dated 30.4.2005 passed by Additional District Judge, Delhi. The land was situated in village Bakkarwala. The Land Acquisition Collector fixed the market values of the land @ Rs. 96,875/-per bigha. Dissatisfied, the appellants preferred a reference petition under Section 18 of the Act. The matter was accordingly referred to the Additional District Judge for fixing just and fair market value. After examining the evidence produced by the parties the learned Additional District Judge enhanced the compensation to Rs.1,08,000/-per bigha besides other usual benefits. The appellants were still not satisfied and filed this appeal for further enhancement on the ground that the reference court did not properly appreciate the evidence led by the appellant.

2. There is no dispute that the compensation awarded by the learned Additional District Judge in respect of land in village Bakkarwala was challenged both by the landowners and the Union of India. The land owners’ appeal for enhancement of the compensation was allowed and compensation was fixed at Rs.1,32,000/-per bigha while that of the respondent/Union of India was dismissed by judgment dated 25.5.2006 in L.A. APP.No.189-91/2006 titled Jai Singh & Others v. Union of India & Anr. Since the compensation in respect of same notification as is involved in the present appeal already stands determined by a judgment of this Court in Jai Singh & Others v. Union of India & Anr. (supra), the present appeal is also disposed of in the said terms and the compensation is enhanced to Rs. 1,32,000/-per bigha with the benefits mentioned in the said judgment.

3. However, the appellants shall not be entitled to interest for the period of delay, in filing the appeal i.e. for the period commencing from the date of the impugned judgment till the date of filing of the appeal excluding 90 days.

4. The appeal stands disposed of. A copy of Jai Singh’s judgment (supra) be placed on this file. Decree sheets be prepared accordingly.



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top