S. Muralidhar, J.

.1. These petitions under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) challenge two Kalandaras arising out of the same set of events. The first is titled State v. Asha Pant And Anr. and the other is titled State v. Kanwal Chaudhri and Anr. both pending in the court of Special Executive Magistrate (SEM), New Delhi and the notices issued to the petitioners in each of the petitions under Sections 107 and 111 CrPC.

2. The events leading to the filing of the present case, as stated in the petition Crl.M.C. No. 2077 of 2006, is that the property at 10A Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi (hereinafter the property) was owned by Mrs. Kanwal Chaudhri, the Petitioner No. 1 in Crl. M.C. 2416-17 of 2006. Mr. Ranjan Pant , the husband of Mrs. Asha Pant, the petitioner in Crl.M.C. No. 2077 of 2006, purchased a portion of the said property from Mrs. Kanwal Chaudhri on 8th July, 2002. It is stated that Mrs. Asha Pant and her husband stay out of Delhi most of the time as they are engaged in consultation business. Although according to Mrs. Pant things were peaceful soon after the purchase of the portion of the property, she was surprised when some time in 2003 M