S.RAVINDRA BHAT
Nitin Jain – Appellant
Versus
Murari Lal Behl – Respondent
S. Ravindra Bhat, J.
1. In this suit, the plaintiff seeks a decree against the defendant for specific performance of an Agreement to Sell dated 7.6.1995 in respect of the second floor and terrace thereupon of the property being No. Y-39, Hauz Khas, New Delhi, (hereinafter called ?the suit property? and ?the plot?) measuring 200 sq.yds after obtaining Income Tax Clearance Certificate in Form 34-A from the appropriate authorities. Alternatively, in the event the Court finds that decree for specific performance cannot be granted, the plaintiff claims, as alternative relief, a decree for refund of Rs. 4 lakhs along with interest @ 24% per annum calculated with effect from the date of payment which amounts to Rs. 2,56,000/- as well as decree for damages to the tune of Rs. 22 lakhs along with interest, totaling Rs. 28,56,000/-.
2. The plaint averments are that one Shri Narender Nath Chadha had purchased the plot through a registered sale deed on 18.3.1959. He sold it to Smt. Ram Lubhai through a registered sale deed, dated 26.9.1961. Smt. Ram Lunbhai constructed a two and a half storied building on the plot with her funds. She executed a registered Will before her death. The Will
Kunnen Veetil Josephs Son Methew v. Nuda Bara Kisuvile Sori AIR 1987 SC 2328
Govind Ram v. Gian Chand AIR 2000 SC 3106
Raj Rani Bhasin and Anr. v. Kartar Singh AIR 1975 (Del) 137
Vijai Bahadur v. Shri Kumar AIR 1985 All 223
Hira Acharya Swami Ganesh Dass Ji v. Sita Ram Thapar AIR 1996 SC 2095
Indian Financial Association of Seventh Day Adventists v. M.A. Unneerikutty 2006 (6) SCC 351
Mrs. Sandhya Pani v. Smt. Sudha Rani AIR 1978 SC 537
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.