SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Del) 608

ARUNA SURESH
Brahm Prakash Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff:Manish Gandhi, Adv. For Respondents/Defendant: Lovkesh Sawhney, APP

JUDGMENT

Aruna Suresh, J.

1. In this petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (hereinafter referred to as Code) the petitioner has sought setting aside of the order dated 11.7.2007 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge thereby rejecting the prayer of the petitioner for directions to the police under Section 156

(3) of the Code filed along with his complaint dated 10.1.2007 for investigation with further prayer to direct the SHO of the concerned police station to lodge an FIR against the accused persons for the criminal offences which they allegedly committed, under appropriate provisions of the Indian Penal code. Further relief sought is issuance of the order for summoning of the accused person and to take cognizance and conduct the trial.

.2. Complainant had purchased a car vide No. DL-2F AH 0100 make Skoda in the month of November 2004 from respondent No. 1 the Managing Director of M/s Silvertone Motors Pvt. Ltd. which was insured with respondent No. 4 Tata AIG Insurance Company Ltd. vide police No. 0195293018 in October 2005. The policy was to expire on 2.11.2006. In April, 2006, the said vehicle met with an accident at Alipur, Delhi and was tak




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top