SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Del) 269

MOOL CHAND GARG
VIVEK GOENKA – Appellant
Versus
STATE (N. C. T. OF DELHI) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. N.B. Joshi, Mr. Purshottam Mishra, advs.
Ms. S. Kohli, APP.

MOOL CHAND GARG, J.

1. This common order shall dispose of the aforesaid two petition

which arise from a common order passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, New Delhi on 27.09.2007 whereby the Magistrate concerned refused to recall the order of summoning passed in this case against both the petitioners on the basis of an application moved by them to drop the proceedings under Section 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.)

2. The brief matrix of filing of the present petitions are :

i) A complaint was filed by Sh. K.M. Anees-ul-Haq, against Sh. Shekhar Gupta, petitioner in Crl.Rev.P.637/2007 and Commi Kapoor, Editor (Delhi) of the Indian Express Daily, Sh. Vivek Goenka, Managing Editor (Petitioner in Crl.M.C.4037/2005), Sh. G.R. Saxena under Sections 500/501 of IPC. All the accused persons including the present petitioners were summoned to face trial in the aforesaid complaint by learned Metropolitan Magistrate concerned.

ii) The petitioners moved an application before the MM concerned to drop the proceedings against them at the stage of deciding the question of framing of notice under Section 251 Cr.P.C. The application was moved by the accused persons on the
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top