SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Del) 650

MOOL CHAND GARG
RAVI OBEROI – Appellant
Versus
JINDAL LEASE FINANCE LTD. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. C.M. Oberoi, adv.
Mr. Mandeep S. Vinaik, adv. for the complainant.

MOOL CHAND GARG, J.

1. This judgment shall dispose of the petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.) seeking issue of appropriate orders/directions for quashing of notice/summons dated 17.07.2000 issued by the Court of Metropolitan Magistrate, Patiala House, New Delhi summoning the petitioner Ravi Oberoi under Section 420/468/406 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) in addition to other accused persons and for quashing of the criminal proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of a complaint filed by respondent No.1 on 09.10.1998 which has been described by the petitioner as the second complaint.

2. It is the case of the petitioners that the complaint dated 09.10.1998 (hereinafter referred to as the „second complaint?) is based upon the same transaction and on the basis of same allegations which form the basis of earlier complaint filed by the respondent No.1 against the petitioners and respondents No. 2 to 4 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (N.I. Act) read with Sections 403/406/420 IPC read with Section 120B of the IPC. The said complaint was filed in November, 1996, of which cognizance has been taken by the Court of concerned Metropolita











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top