SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Del) 588

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, ARUNA SURESH
GOKAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Ms. Ritu Gauba, Advocate
Mr. Pawan Sharma, Advocate

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.

1. Vide impugned judgment and order dated 22.03.2001, the appellant has been convicted for the offence of having murdered Rekha (herein after referred to as the “Deceased”).

2. Case of the prosecution is that the appellant and the deceased were residing as husband and wife, as tenants, in a single room on the second floor in a building owned by Shashi PW-1 who lived on the ground floor of the building and that on 13.11.1998, the appellant poured kerosene oil on the deceased and set her on fire. Shashi heard voices that the deceased had been burnt and she moved upstairs. She saw the appellant coming down. On seeing Shashi, the appellant stopped his forward movement and returned upstairs. The deceased was found on the floor in a burnt condition. Shashi and the appellant removed the deceased to G.T.B.Hospital where Dr.R.Dayal PW-10 recorded her MLC Ex.PW-10/A on which he noted the history of the alleged burn as under:- “Alleged H/o being burnt by husband Gokul by pouring kerosene oil Informant self. O/E Conscious Oriented ………… Fit for statement 100% burns superficial to deep in nature……..” The deceased died as a result of burn injuries. On being apprehended and i

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top