SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Del) 784

INDERMEET KAUR, PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
BABUDDIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr.Sumeet Verma, Amicus Curiae.
Mr.Pawan Sharma and Ms.Richa Kapoor, APPs.

JUDGMENT

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.

1. With reference to the testimony of Daleep PW-11; holding that the same establishes that the deceased Pradeep was seen in the company of the appellants at 10:30 PM at Bhatiara Chowk on 4.9.1998 and since the body of the deceased was found the next morning on 5.9.1998 at around 10:00 AM at DDA Park near Buland Masjid, Shastri Park, the learned Trial Judge has held that since the appellants have not explained when and how they parted company with the deceased, a conclusion could be drawn from said evidence that the appellants had murdered the deceased. It has further been held that evidence establishes that upon being apprehended, appellants Yasin and Ismail made disclosure statements giving information to the investigating officer that they could get recovered shirts worn by Iqbal and Yasin which they were wearing when they murdered the deceased and thereafter got the same recovered on which blood was detected. The same has been held to be further incriminating evidence. Qua appellants Iqbal and Babuddin, it has been held that evidence establishes that pursuant to their disclosure statements in which they stated that they had hidden the knives with





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top