INDERMEET KAUR, PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
BABUDDIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.
1. With reference to the testimony of Daleep PW-11; holding that the same establishes that the deceased Pradeep was seen in the company of the appellants at 10:30 PM at Bhatiara Chowk on 4.9.1998 and since the body of the deceased was found the next morning on 5.9.1998 at around 10:00 AM at DDA Park near Buland Masjid, Shastri Park, the learned Trial Judge has held that since the appellants have not explained when and how they parted company with the deceased, a conclusion could be drawn from said evidence that the appellants had murdered the deceased. It has further been held that evidence establishes that upon being apprehended, appellants Yasin and Ismail made disclosure statements giving information to the investigating officer that they could get recovered shirts worn by Iqbal and Yasin which they were wearing when they murdered the deceased and thereafter got the same recovered on which blood was detected. The same has been held to be further incriminating evidence. Qua appellants Iqbal and Babuddin, it has been held that evidence establishes that pursuant to their disclosure statements in which they stated that they had hidden the knives with
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.