SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Del) 1091

INDERMEET KAUR
PRAJAN KUMAR JAIN – Appellant
Versus
RAVI MALHOTRA – Respondent


Advocates appeared
Mr.R.P.Sharma and Mr.Amit Punj, Advocates.
Mr.M.L.Mahajan and Mr.Gaurav Mahajan, Advocates.

Judgment

INDERMEET KAUR, J. 1. This petition seeks quashing of the complaint No.1535/1 titled as Sh.Ravi Malhotra vs. Sh.Prajan Kumar Jain filed under Sections 138/142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (hereinafter referred to as NI Act) read with Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code. Complainant is Ravi Malhotra. Prajan Kumar Jain has been arrayed as the accused.

2. The short point raised in this petition is that the two cheques i.e. cheque no.7375535 dated 25.3.2005 for Rs.5 lakhs and cheque no.7375536 dated 30.4.2005 for Rs.5 lakhs do not come within the ambit of a ‘legally enforceable debt’. The said cheques had been issued for the discharge of a liability arising out of an agreement dated 14.6.2000; and having been issued on 25.3.2005 and 30.4.2005 were for the discharge of debt which had become time barred. The complaint is thus liable to be quashed. 3. To appreciate this submission salient paragraphs of the complaint filed by Ravi Malhotra are reproduced.: “2. That by an agreement dated 14.06.2000, entered into by the complainant with the accused and his brother, Shri Vijay Kumar Jain, to purchase the agricultural land measuring 12 Bighas and 03 Biswas, bearing Mustatil No.54

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top