SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Del) 894

MOOL CHAND GARG
SAYED ABU NASIR – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates appeared
Mr. Asit Kumar Roy, adv.
Mr. Navin Sharma, APP for the State.

Judgment

MOOL CHAND GARG, J.

1. This appeal has been filed by the appellant against his conviction by the Addl. Sessions Judge Delhi in Sessions Case No. 156/2 arising out of FIR No. 41/99 which was registered at P.S. New Delhi Railway Station under Section 121/121-A/122/123 IPC r/w Section 120-B IPC, under Section 3 & 4 of the Explosive Substances Act, and Section 14 of the Foreigners Act.

2. By the impugned judgment, the appellant was convicted only under Section 4 (b) of the Explosive Substances Act, while he was acquitted of all other charges. The sentence of 7 years awarded to him has already been undergone by him.

3. The appellant has filed the present appeal by alleging that he has been falsely implicated in this case and that he was brought to Delhi by the Police officials of Crime Branch.

4. In his appeal, it has been alleged by the appellant that he was not involved in this case but has been falsely implicated by the Police officials of Crime Branch who brought him from Hyderabad sometime on 28/29.12.2006 and thereafter, falsely implicated him in this case. It is submitted that at the time of his arrest he was already in Police custody and therefore, the possibility of rec


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top