MOOL CHAND GARG
SAYED ABU NASIR – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
MOOL CHAND GARG, J.
1. This appeal has been filed by the appellant against his conviction by the Addl. Sessions Judge Delhi in Sessions Case No. 156/2 arising out of FIR No. 41/99 which was registered at P.S. New Delhi Railway Station under Section 121/121-A/122/123 IPC r/w Section 120-B IPC, under Section 3 & 4 of the Explosive Substances Act, and Section 14 of the Foreigners Act.
2. By the impugned judgment, the appellant was convicted only under Section 4 (b) of the Explosive Substances Act, while he was acquitted of all other charges. The sentence of 7 years awarded to him has already been undergone by him.
3. The appellant has filed the present appeal by alleging that he has been falsely implicated in this case and that he was brought to Delhi by the Police officials of Crime Branch.
4. In his appeal, it has been alleged by the appellant that he was not involved in this case but has been falsely implicated by the Police officials of Crime Branch who brought him from Hyderabad sometime on 28/29.12.2006 and thereafter, falsely implicated him in this case. It is submitted that at the time of his arrest he was already in Police custody and therefore, the possibility of rec
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.