SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
Sheela Gehlot – Appellant
Versus
Sonu Kochar – Respondent
1. The plaintiff has filed the suit for specific performance or, in the alternative, for recovery of damages in respect of property bearing No. 60, Poorvi Marg, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi measuring 819 sq. yds.
2. The plaintiff had filed an application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 read with section 151 CPC (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code') for ad interim injunction in respect of the property in question along with the suit and interim orders were granted on 11.5.2005 directing status quo to be maintained in respect of property at the stage when the summons were issued in the suit. Thereafter certain directions were passed for the plaintiff to appear in court along with documents to show that the plaintiff was capable of making the payment of Rs.9.3 crores which was the stated consideration by the plaintiff in respect of the property in question and for the plaintiff to produce Income Tax Returns and pass book of bank accounts maintained by her. The plaintiff filed an affidavit with Income Tax Returns for the assessment year 2005-2006 along with details of bank account. The bank account showed meagre amounts of couple of thousand rupees. It was found t
Alopi Parshad & Sons, Ltd. v. Union of India
Ashok Kumar Goenka v. Shri Krishan Kumar Gupta 2003 (71) DRJ 154
Ganesh Shet v. Dr. C.S.G.K. Setty AIR 1998 SC 2216
J.K. Rajgarhia v. Dr. Ravi Singh & Ors. 1995 (34) DRJ 199
Mayawanti v. Kaushalya Devi (1990) 3 SCC 1
Sanwarmal Goenka v. Soumyendra Chandra Gooptu AIR 1981 Cal 37
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.