SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Del) 1238

SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
Jaggi Ayurvedic Pharmacy – Appellant
Versus
Jaggi Ayurvedic Research Foundation – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr.S.K. Bansal, Advocate
Mr. Sujoy Kumar, Advocate

ORDER

1. By this application under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC read with Section 151 of Civil Procedure Code, plaintiff sought injunction against defendant restraining defendant from use of trademark, word/ mark, house mark “JAGGI” and restraining defendant from using the logo, tradedress and carton with trademark “JAGGI”.

2. Plaintiff has claimed itself to be a partnership firm of three partners namely Mr. Om Prakash Jaggi, Mr. Sudesh Kumar Jaggi and Ms. Priya Rani Jaggi. It is stated that this partnership firm was formed in 1955 under an oral agreement between Mr. Darshan Lal Jaggi and Mr. Om Prakash Jaggi and it was reduced into writing in 1959 and since then the partnership firm namely „Jaggi Ayrvedic Pharmacy? has been using the trade name “JAGGI” and logos, trade dress, work/mark “JAGGI” and it became owner and proprietor of the word/ mark “JAGGI” and became copyright owner of trade dress, logos etc.

3. Defendant on the other hand has resisted granting of any injunction on the ground that the suit was filed by a dissolved partnership firm and was not maintainable. Ms. Priya Rani Jaggi, one of the partners, filed a suit 1798 of 2002 making Mr. Om Prakash Jaggi and Mr. Sudesh Jaggi










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top