RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
SAVITRI DEVI – Appellant
Versus
GAYATRI DEVI – Respondent
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.
1. All the six petitions have been preferred invoking the jurisdiction of this court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India with respect to the order of the first appellate court on an application under Order 41Rule 27 of the CPC. In all the cases, the application under Order 41Rule 27 of the CPC was disposed of by the first appellate court before taking up the appeal for hearing, leading to the grievance being made with respect thereto before this court as aforesaid, even while the appeals in each of the cases are still pending for consideration before the first appellate court. This court being prima facie of the view that a challenge to the decision, if any, on an application under Order 41 Rule 27 of the CPC taken up prior to the hearing of the appeal, is not entertainable before this court, put the said question to the counsels as and when each of the said matters came up before this court. Attention of the counsels was also drawn by this court to the judgments of the Supreme Court in Gurdev Singh Vs. Mehnga Ram AIR 1997 SC 3572 and in Mahavir Singh Vs. Naresh Chandra (2001) 1 SCC 309. The common questions as to the very maintainability
2. Mahavir Singh v. Naresh Chandra
3. Akash Ganga Builders & Engineers Pvt. Ltd. v. G.P. Seth (HUF)
4. Nawab Slzaqafath Ali Khan v. Nawab lmdad Jah Bahadur
5. Jaipur Development Authority v. Kailashwati Devi
6. Eastern Equipment and Sales Ltd. v. ING Yash Kumar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.